5 Helpful Tips On How To Critique A Research Paper

At some point during your academic career you are likely going to be asked to critique a research paper. It may be one that has been written by one of your student peers for the class, or it may just be a random paper that your professor is using as an example. There are numerous questions you are going to have to answer. Regardless of who the author is, here is what you need to know to critique the paper properly in each of the 5 main sections:

Introduction: Begin by reading the thesis statement and understanding what the objective was. Make sure the title is a precise statement of the paper's subject. The statement in the abstract should also match with the introduction.

Methods: Review all of the methods used. Are they valid choices for the study of the subject? Is all the essential information available so that the study could be duplicated by someone else? Check for fatal flaws. Is the design of the experiment and the sample selection adequate?

Results: Closely examine the data that is presented in the illustrations and tables. Is content accurately described by the legend or title? Are the labels and column headings accurate? Does the organization of data make for ready interpretation and comparison? Review the text result while using the illustrations and tables data to make sure they complement each other, rather than being repetitive. Are there any flaws or discrepancies? Double-check all of the calculations and how the data is presented. Do the results give the answer to the question that was posed by the researcher?

Discussion: Is the data far-fetched or does it logically rise from interpretation? Is the interpretation in line or at odds with other cited research? Think about what has already been published on the topic. Have all of the previous key studies been considered within this paper? Is there a suggestion for further work in the topic?

Overview: Which journal is the paper going to appear in? Is the format appropriate for this publication? read through the abstract a second time and be certain that it is an accurate summary of the paper. Check through the structure (including paragraphs and titles) to be sure that everything is organized in the proper section. Are they logically subdivided? Consider the writing and thinking style of the author. Has all of the required information been presented clearly and in the most logical way possible?